RetiredMember
Guest
But don't you think its more controversial when the TM name is an acronym? "MSN" has 31 acronyms on acronym finder, so couldn't the person who registered it want to use it for something else? "MSN" just happens to be one of microsofts main businesses, but the person could have a decent argument arguing that they wanted to use it vis-a-vis another acronym. I just feel acronyms should be much harder to take away through INDRP because they mean many things, so who decides what the "real" meaning is?
In that case arbitrator primary focus on USE OF DOMAIN and TM , if for example of MSN if the registrant uses the domain for the similar services or goods in which Microsoft deals then risk of domain loosing increases or shows parking page on that then Microsoft can claim that they are violating their trademark term and showing competitors ad on domain.
So use of Domain is very important particularly if you want to survive against the strong TM.