QRG.in INDRP Decision a DISASTER

CyberKing

Domain Investor
Country flag
Absolute tragedy - the quality of response cannot determine the decision of a Arbitrator - this one was a pathetic fall over by someone ignorant of the law and application of the 3 part rule to the fullest - this panelist should be removed IMO

TYPING MISTAKES INCLUDE REFERENCING THE CO.IN on occasion

NIXI obviously has a LOW QUALITY THRESHOLD IN SELECTING THESE ARBITRATORS - PATHETICALLY LOW.

https://registry.in/system/files/qrgin.PDF
 

Jeff

Administrator
Staff member
Country flag
I'm not sure I agree - if the respondent gives up, then it is not the arbitrator's job to put up a defence for the respondent.
 

CyberKing

Domain Investor
Country flag
I'm not sure I agree - if the respondent gives up, then it is not the arbitrator's job to put up a defence for the respondent.

Its the arbitrators job to judiciously apply the principles of law and the guidelines to meet the minimum threshold required to prove the three INDRP conditions are met satisfactorily the burden to prove which is the COMPLAINANTS not the respondants.

This IMO has not happened in this case.


Per procedural rules as below the Arbitrator failed

An Arbitrator shall be and remain at all times impartial and independent is the rule 6/i per NIXI

Per Rule 8

a. An Arbitrator shall conduct the arbitration proceeding in such manner as it considers appropriate in accordance with the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, Dispute Resolution Policy, the Rules of Procedure and any bye-laws, rules and guidelines framed thereunder.

b. In all cases, the Arbitrator shall ensure that the Parties are treated with equality and that each Party is given a fair opportunity to present its case.

c. Every Arbitrator shall ensure that the arbitration proceedings takes place with due expedition.

Rule 8 a went out the window in this case because he was incompetent to the core and ignorant of law
 

CyberKing

Domain Investor
Country flag
This matter was settled outside INDRP and this arbitrator perhaps to claim has USD 500 in fees simply created this order which is baseless and copied most of content from an earlier ruling in Jan 2017 for QRG.co.in where same gaffes have been committed.

Like I said poor governance makes dot INs erode in value.
 

LLL.in King

Well-Known Member
Country flag
I think this case is interesting regarding the quality of the LLL.in here. A name like qrg.in would have been appraised on the low side by most .in domainers, but here we see a company paying/willing to pay a decent sum to take ownership via INDRP. The point is, with regards to LLL.in, alot of value is based on the buyer's need and perception, and not always "technicals".
 

CyberKing

Domain Investor
Country flag
Yes but it also reflects on the ignorant "domain traders" who flip for peanuts and run for cover on a email notice even before an INDRP is filed let alone fight a INDRP with reasonable response. The whole "dot IN ecosystem" is screwed up...IMO
 

LLL.in King

Well-Known Member
Country flag
Yes but it also reflects on the ignorant "domain traders" who flip for peanuts and run for cover on a email notice even before an INDRP is filed let alone fight a INDRP with reasonable response
Those people exist in every domain extension. Its sometimes a strategy that works for some people, and sometimes its due to short sightedness(quick smaller profit vs more patient bigger profit). Look on the flipside- they sometimes sell people like u and me great gems for cheap prices. Nice to be a buyer in those situations. Tbh though, there has been a slight change in .in with regards to flipping- most of the names flipped these days are not that good, or the prices are not cheap when they are. There has been progress.

.
The whole "dot IN ecosystem" is screwed up...IMO
Just like cryptos, the best time to jump in is when things are "screwed up". Once they become stable and unscrewed the price to enter won't be tenable for many. Profit margins will also be considerably less.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
CyberKing QRG.IN and GoSport.IN in INDRP Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Jeff NIXI Amending INDRP Rules, Policy, & Code of Conduct Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Jeff Great history of INDRP Legal Issues and Dispute 0
CyberKing TigerBrand.in will be interesting INDRP Legal Issues and Dispute 0
CyberKing INDRP Watch - Interesting Disputes Legal Issues and Dispute 2
kriss05 Hottie.com UDRP: complainant is guilty of RDNH; Hottie.in INDRP: domain ordered to be transferred. Legal Issues and Dispute 8
kriss05 NNCC.in INDRP case decision has been published: 4L.in domain investors beware! Legal Issues and Dispute 12
D 4 New INDRP disputes registered in June month Legal Issues and Dispute 2
Jeff INDRP article with mention of INForum member General Indian Domain Name Discussion 0
CyberKing GST.IN - A classic INDRP Deja vu Legal Issues and Dispute 4
domaining123 My LLL.in to INDRP? Legal Issues and Dispute 10
CyberKing INDRP - Combined.IN another horrendous decision Legal Issues and Dispute 6
CyberKing INDRP: NaturesBasket.in a missed opportunity? Legal Issues and Dispute 0
CyberKing INDRP: ZIFI.IN Could be interesting Legal Issues and Dispute 5
CyberKing INDRP: Taking on the Big G? Legal Issues and Dispute 1
CyberKing MUST READ: Historic INDRP Decision! Legal Issues and Dispute 6
CyberKing INDRP - Pipeline getting worse Legal Issues and Dispute 1
CyberKing WTF - INDRP? Legal Issues and Dispute 0
CyberKing INDRP vs The Chinese Squatters of Indian Domains Legal Issues and Dispute 1
CyberKing INDRP - Mozilla.IN and StarWars.IN Legal Issues and Dispute 1
CyberKing How NOT to respond to a INDRP case complaint Legal Issues and Dispute 7
Jeff Registry to charge service tax on INDRP fees Legal Issues and Dispute 1
D Some practise questions about INDRP and Indian court Legal Issues and Dispute 2
Jeff DoubleClick.in INDRP Decision Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres INDRP Costs Award Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Jeff SunglassHut.in INDRP decision Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres INDRP: AndhraPrabha.in & Google-Money-System.in Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres INDRP Complaints re Lego.co.in and Accor.co.in Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres Mobil.in INDRP decision Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres Talk about a vague INDRP decision: Alibaba.in Legal Issues and Dispute 3
C If the trademark owner proves its claim through the INDRP Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres INDRP Respondent Ordered To Pay Costs Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres Google Wins Domain Name in INDRP Case Legal Issues and Dispute 3
Ceres Starbucks Wins INDRP Case Legal Issues and Dispute 4
Ceres Spicy IP's Review of INDRP cases Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres Alstom Awarded Alstom.in in INDRP Case Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres Respondent Wins INDRP Case: Chiesi.in Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres INDRP: ArmaniExchange.in & Eurocopter.in Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres 2nd INDRP Complaint by Allianz SE Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres INDRP Proceeding: Bloomberg.net.in Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres INDRP & Trademark Domains Legal Issues and Dispute 7
Ceres INDRP: Broadcom Challenges "Digital Broadcom" Domain & Trademark Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres INDRP Decision: AmpNetConnect.co.in Legal Issues and Dispute 1
Ceres Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute Legal Issues and Dispute 3
Ceres Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision Legal Issues and Dispute 6
Jeff Do You Have INDRP Questions? Legal Issues and Dispute 15
Ceres Convergys wins Convergys.in in INDRP case Legal Issues and Dispute 3
Ceres Umm.in - INDRP decision Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Ceres INDRP: Axa.in - When not to park a domain Legal Issues and Dispute 13
Ceres Latest INDRP decisions Legal Issues and Dispute 12

Similar threads

whois



Forums dedicated to Indian domain names, including buying, selling, appraising, developing, and monetizing.

About Us

Threads
26,891
Messages
73,862
Members
7,639
Latest member
rohanarya2612
Top Bottom