Hottie.com UDRP: complainant is guilty of RDNH; Hottie.in INDRP: domain ordered to be transferred.

kriss05

Well-Known Member
Hottie.com UDRP: complainant is guilty of RDNH - link

Hottie.in INDRP: domain ordered to be transferred to the same complainant - link

Some rulings from Hottie.in INDRP case made by arbitrator Ranjan Narula:

"The respondent contended that the Complainant has registered trademark in Australia and New Zealand which is unrelated to doing business in India. However, according to several INDRP and WIPO decisions, if the Complainant owns a trademark, then it generally satisfies the threshold requirement of having trademark rights. The location of the trademark, its date of registration (or first use) , and the goods and/or services for which it is registered, are all irrelevant for the purpose of finding rights in a trademark under the first element."

So, according to the above arbitartor, time, location, goods/services trademarked are all irrelevant for the sake of INDRP process. So, the owner of any sh*tty TM registered anywhere in the world can file INDRP dispute to steal the valuable domain? What a BS. Further, he should at least have read Hottie.com UDRP case where the complainant was found guilty of RDNH due to, among others, the fact that hottie.com was registered before the complainant registered its Hottie mark.

"The difficulty in this case lies in the fact that the domain name www.hottie.in, although descriptive or generic in relation to certain services or goods, maybe a valid trademark for others. The difficulty is expounded by the fact that, while hottie may be considered a common world in English speaking countries, this may not be the case in non English speaking countries."

The arbitrator accepts that "hottie" is generic English word. Australia, New Zealand, USA, India, i.e. countries mentioned in the Hottie.in INDRP, are all English speaking counties. Why the heck he mentions non English speaking countries and thinks that non English countries are by any means related to this INDRP?

"...the domain name www.hottie.in is merely parked by the Respondent to generate advertising revenue by "click-through" or "pay per click" business model.

This business model though legitimate may be done with a legitimate domain name. If, on other hand, another's trademark is used without authorization for the purpose of attracting visitors, then some visitors may be confused into thinking, at least initially, that the website they have reached is in some way endorsed by the Complainant, when it is not. I find that in this case that the Respondent has attracted viewers for commercial gain by confusion, constituting registration and use in bad faith."


What a BS. According to Ranjan Narula, only domains for which there are no registered trademarks anywhere in the world can be monetized via PPC? He should have read tons of UDRP decisions where it was ruled that owning TM merely doesn't give the Complainant rights to the disputed domain name and that PPC monetization is a bona-fide use in case of "trademarked" domains, if domains are generic in nature and PPC ads don't relate to the Complainant and/or its business. In his turn, the arbitrator had no finding that PPC ads served on Hottie.in were related to the Complainant and/or its business. Even the Complainant contends that PPC ads served on Hottie.in are not related to its business. They were adult-related, and "hottie" may have adult sense pretty much. I'm personally against any adult content on the web, but trying to take the domain away from rightful owner on the base of false allegations is much worse.

Many people wonder all the time why there is no much interest to .in domains from foreign medium/high level domain investors. The reason is INDRP arbitration is a joke as it was again proven in the Hottie.in case by the arbitrator Ranjan Narula.

In this regard, I was always wondering why INDRP arbitrators were/are being invited to the domain conferences all the time. They no doubt enjoy such "vacations", being honored and invited to sit among domain gurus etc., but most of them in fact are domainers non-friendly. What is the point to spend money on them? Imho almost all of them should have been ignored, and only those who were proven to rule honestly and competently in INDRP cases can be allowed to be among invited guests, speakers etc.
 
Last edited:

kriss05

Well-Known Member
Oh yes. From the tvs.co.in INDRP case:

"The Complainant has firmly refuted that TVS is a non-distinctive acronym widely used for Televisions. The documents submitted by the complainant, as Exhibit-B, clearly show that the websites in India have used TVs (with S as a small letter) as an acronym for Television. On the other hand, TVS is a well-known trade mark in India derived from the founder's name T V Sundaram Iyengar and Sons. Therefore, it is reiterated that the Respondent's lame defense that TVS is a commonly used acronym is wrong and without any valid ground."

What was that above? Do you read it as I do? Maybe there is alternative meaning of the above I'm not aware of?
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
The pearl from the TVS.co.in INDRP arbitrator Amarjit Singh:

"The Panel agree with the contention of the Respondent that the Complainant has not been able to establish its right in the trade/service mark TVS in Canada. However, the goodwill and common law rights have no such territorial boundaries. In todays world, the goodwill travel beyond geographical boundaries of countries. The Panel further agree with the Respondent that the term TVs can be used for television provided the same is used in a generic bonafide manner."

The above causes me physical pain. My brain hurts.

Arbitrator agrees that it is generic term and that the Complainant has no TM rights in Canada, the country of residence of respondent.

The 2010 court case (HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI): Century 21 Real Estate L.L.C. vs. Century 21 Main Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.:

"The plaintiff has not placed on record any document to show that its reputation has travelled to India in any manner. Merely because a company is having presence in many countries in the business of reality does not mean that the company’s reputation has travelled to every single country on earth. Reputation and goodwill of a company are intangible assets and these intangible assets are to be shown to exist. Intangible assets in India are to be proved by way of evidence. There can be no presumption in favour of a corporation of intangible assets in India merely because the company has a reputation and goodwill somewhere else."

Yet 6 years later arbitrator Amarjit Singh ruled absolutely opposite.

So this arbitrator is not only not familiar with basics of domain dispute proceedings, but his rulings contradict with the very rulings of the Indian High Court. Perfect example of an arbitrator who should have never been allowed to be invited guest/speaker on any domain conference.
 
Last edited:

Jeff

Administrator
Staff member
Country flag
Thanks @kriss05!

Is there a way to search Indian case law available online, or how are you finding these cases?
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
As far as I remember it is possible on Delhi/Hyderabad high court websites, but it was a pain a bit last year. Also few websites offer similar subscription-based services.
 

wot

Well-Known Member
Country flag
Maybe cynical but!

Plain and simple there is corruption in low places, happened too often with .in domains for it not to be happening.
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
I wonder why Nixi don't care about it. Don't they realize how they and INDRP arbitration, not to mention "honorable" INDRP arbitrators, look in views of everyone but them.

If they are unable to find few honest and competent arbitrators in India, they could outsource dispute proceedings to UDRP arbitrators. Being non-profit org, they have enough cash to cover UDRP fees.
 

domainpundit

Active Member
Country flag
I wonder why Nixi don't care about it. Don't they realize how they and INDRP arbitration, not to mention "honorable" INDRP arbitrators, look in views of everyone but them.

If they are unable to find few honest and competent arbitrators in India, they could outsource dispute proceedings to UDRP arbitrators. Being non-profit org, they have enough cash to cover UDRP fees.
I can't understand either.. INDRP is nothing but official route to steal the domain names..hope registry at least come to pragmatic approach.. I lost my respect for Mr Ranjan for sure after reading this thread.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Prashant Sharan Web.com buys Webcentral for $12.2 million Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 12th July Market Update: $173k in Sales - Digitizer.com sold for $10,938 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 11th July Market Update: $219k in Sales - W67.com sold for $7,777 Non-Indian Domains 0
sivaprakash CRYPTOCASHY.COM Non-India Related Domains 0
sivaprakash BITCASHY.COM Non-India Related Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 10th July Market Update: $243k in Sales - Leek.com sold for $27,752 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Registrars in terms of .com Sales Registrars 0
DNJournal.com Vehicle.com Keeps Monte Cahn at Top of Domain Sales Chart, Morgan Linton Also Lights Up Leader Board The Lounge 0
Prashant Sharan DomainSherpa reviews JE.net, MoodRing.com, Transcribe.com Resources 0
Prashant Sharan Hasan Minhaj things : Patriot Act with Hasan Minhaj registers TurboTaxSucksAss.com Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan TheDomainShow.com announces Speakers - registration is open and free for the upcoming Online Conference Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan Prime Loyalty and Grit Brokerage pair up to sell Client.com and Clients.com Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan Kassey Lee reviews the sale of 89CP .com for $5,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 5th July Market Update: $222k in Sales - Strobe.com sold for $51,010 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Vehicle.com sells for $121K + Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 4th July Market Update: $172k in Sales - Oyuncu.com sold for $5,907 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 3rd July Market Update: $171k in Sales - Packable.com sold for $6,388 Non-Indian Domains 0
sivaprakash ElectricVehicleCar.com Non-India Related Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Intuit missed TurboTaxSucksAss.com Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan LMX.com opens to all liquid domains irrespective of their EstiBot appraised value Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan .Club registry and other domain name extensions to benefit from “Booking.com” ruling Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan Right-wing news blog Vdare.com doesn't find a home in Epik Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan SCOTUS rules in favour of booking.com - Now, you can trademark generic domains Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan Chinese Domains: Kassey Lee reviews the sale of HuangGuan.com for $30,728 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 30th June Market Update: $241k in Sales - SmartInvestment.com sold for $7,701 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan IEE.com becomes subject of UDRP Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 29th June Market Update: $193k in Sales - Metapress.com sold for $20,005 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Amazon registers ClimatePledgeArena.com for its Climate Pledge Arena; Greenpeace slams it as ‘meaningless and costly PR stunt’ Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 28th June Market Update: $169k in Sales - ChangeX.com sold for $5,649 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 27th June Market Update: $209k in Sales - 112211.com sold for $13,738 Non-Indian Domains 0
sivaprakash karrency.com ($ € £ ¥) Non-India Related Domains 2
Prashant Sharan Morgan Linton on whether startups opt for .net if a .Com isn't available. Resources 0
Prashant Sharan 26th June Market Update: $169k in Sales - CharteredCare.com sold for $15,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
DomainFQ.com $20 Each, BigDue.com |PassengerTaxi.com | BettingoddsTv.com |shoppe.best | Raws.xyz Non-India Related Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 25th June Market Update: $293k in Sales - 4042.com sold for $13,250 Non-Indian Domains 0
L Some good .com domain names for sale.have brand value For Sale / Advertising 0
Prashant Sharan White nationalists' website gets kicked out by Web.com ; Can Epik be the new registar ? Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan Post a funding round, Mirror looks to have acquired Mirror.com Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 22nd June Market Update: $216k in Sales - TheTable.com sold for $5,030 Non-Indian Domains 0
L Some good .com domain names for sale. See if there's anything you like. Non-India Related Domains 0
L sexoin.com on sale Adult Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Amazing !!! : Fitbit.com had just cost $2,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 21st June Market Update: $173k in Sales - OnlineTherapist.com sold for $7,889 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan James Iles on the reasons for Winemaker.com selling for $100,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan LifeInsurance.com.au sale fetches $100K AUD Non-Indian Domains 2
Prashant Sharan 19th June Market Update: $210k in Sales - Reusability.com sold for $6,188 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan CHECK IT OUT : Loser.com forwards to an one minute "Republican Voters Against Trump" video Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 18th June Market Update: $319k in Sale - 444555.com sold for $36,050 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Mike Mann and his company DomainMarket.com has dropped almost 50,000 domains Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan 17th June Market Update: $213k in Sales - Bet89.com sold for $10,500 Non-Indian Domains 0
Similar threads


















































whois



Forums dedicated to Indian domain names, including buying, selling, appraising, developing, and monetizing.

About Us

Threads
26,370
Messages
73,227
Members
7,607
Latest member
yelv
Top Bottom