Hottie.com UDRP: complainant is guilty of RDNH; Hottie.in INDRP: domain ordered to be transferred.

kriss05

Well-Known Member
Hottie.com UDRP: complainant is guilty of RDNH - link

Hottie.in INDRP: domain ordered to be transferred to the same complainant - link

Some rulings from Hottie.in INDRP case made by arbitrator Ranjan Narula:

"The respondent contended that the Complainant has registered trademark in Australia and New Zealand which is unrelated to doing business in India. However, according to several INDRP and WIPO decisions, if the Complainant owns a trademark, then it generally satisfies the threshold requirement of having trademark rights. The location of the trademark, its date of registration (or first use) , and the goods and/or services for which it is registered, are all irrelevant for the purpose of finding rights in a trademark under the first element."

So, according to the above arbitartor, time, location, goods/services trademarked are all irrelevant for the sake of INDRP process. So, the owner of any sh*tty TM registered anywhere in the world can file INDRP dispute to steal the valuable domain? What a BS. Further, he should at least have read Hottie.com UDRP case where the complainant was found guilty of RDNH due to, among others, the fact that hottie.com was registered before the complainant registered its Hottie mark.

"The difficulty in this case lies in the fact that the domain name www.hottie.in, although descriptive or generic in relation to certain services or goods, maybe a valid trademark for others. The difficulty is expounded by the fact that, while hottie may be considered a common world in English speaking countries, this may not be the case in non English speaking countries."

The arbitrator accepts that "hottie" is generic English word. Australia, New Zealand, USA, India, i.e. countries mentioned in the Hottie.in INDRP, are all English speaking counties. Why the heck he mentions non English speaking countries and thinks that non English countries are by any means related to this INDRP?

"...the domain name www.hottie.in is merely parked by the Respondent to generate advertising revenue by "click-through" or "pay per click" business model.

This business model though legitimate may be done with a legitimate domain name. If, on other hand, another's trademark is used without authorization for the purpose of attracting visitors, then some visitors may be confused into thinking, at least initially, that the website they have reached is in some way endorsed by the Complainant, when it is not. I find that in this case that the Respondent has attracted viewers for commercial gain by confusion, constituting registration and use in bad faith."


What a BS. According to Ranjan Narula, only domains for which there are no registered trademarks anywhere in the world can be monetized via PPC? He should have read tons of UDRP decisions where it was ruled that owning TM merely doesn't give the Complainant rights to the disputed domain name and that PPC monetization is a bona-fide use in case of "trademarked" domains, if domains are generic in nature and PPC ads don't relate to the Complainant and/or its business. In his turn, the arbitrator had no finding that PPC ads served on Hottie.in were related to the Complainant and/or its business. Even the Complainant contends that PPC ads served on Hottie.in are not related to its business. They were adult-related, and "hottie" may have adult sense pretty much. I'm personally against any adult content on the web, but trying to take the domain away from rightful owner on the base of false allegations is much worse.

Many people wonder all the time why there is no much interest to .in domains from foreign medium/high level domain investors. The reason is INDRP arbitration is a joke as it was again proven in the Hottie.in case by the arbitrator Ranjan Narula.

In this regard, I was always wondering why INDRP arbitrators were/are being invited to the domain conferences all the time. They no doubt enjoy such "vacations", being honored and invited to sit among domain gurus etc., but most of them in fact are domainers non-friendly. What is the point to spend money on them? Imho almost all of them should have been ignored, and only those who were proven to rule honestly and competently in INDRP cases can be allowed to be among invited guests, speakers etc.
 
Last edited:

kriss05

Well-Known Member
Oh yes. From the tvs.co.in INDRP case:

"The Complainant has firmly refuted that TVS is a non-distinctive acronym widely used for Televisions. The documents submitted by the complainant, as Exhibit-B, clearly show that the websites in India have used TVs (with S as a small letter) as an acronym for Television. On the other hand, TVS is a well-known trade mark in India derived from the founder's name T V Sundaram Iyengar and Sons. Therefore, it is reiterated that the Respondent's lame defense that TVS is a commonly used acronym is wrong and without any valid ground."

What was that above? Do you read it as I do? Maybe there is alternative meaning of the above I'm not aware of?
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
The pearl from the TVS.co.in INDRP arbitrator Amarjit Singh:

"The Panel agree with the contention of the Respondent that the Complainant has not been able to establish its right in the trade/service mark TVS in Canada. However, the goodwill and common law rights have no such territorial boundaries. In todays world, the goodwill travel beyond geographical boundaries of countries. The Panel further agree with the Respondent that the term TVs can be used for television provided the same is used in a generic bonafide manner."

The above causes me physical pain. My brain hurts.

Arbitrator agrees that it is generic term and that the Complainant has no TM rights in Canada, the country of residence of respondent.

The 2010 court case (HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI): Century 21 Real Estate L.L.C. vs. Century 21 Main Realty Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.:

"The plaintiff has not placed on record any document to show that its reputation has travelled to India in any manner. Merely because a company is having presence in many countries in the business of reality does not mean that the company’s reputation has travelled to every single country on earth. Reputation and goodwill of a company are intangible assets and these intangible assets are to be shown to exist. Intangible assets in India are to be proved by way of evidence. There can be no presumption in favour of a corporation of intangible assets in India merely because the company has a reputation and goodwill somewhere else."

Yet 6 years later arbitrator Amarjit Singh ruled absolutely opposite.

So this arbitrator is not only not familiar with basics of domain dispute proceedings, but his rulings contradict with the very rulings of the Indian High Court. Perfect example of an arbitrator who should have never been allowed to be invited guest/speaker on any domain conference.
 
Last edited:

Jeff

Administrator
Staff member
Country flag
Thanks @kriss05!

Is there a way to search Indian case law available online, or how are you finding these cases?
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
As far as I remember it is possible on Delhi/Hyderabad high court websites, but it was a pain a bit last year. Also few websites offer similar subscription-based services.
 

wot

Well-Known Member
Country flag
Maybe cynical but!

Plain and simple there is corruption in low places, happened too often with .in domains for it not to be happening.
 

kriss05

Well-Known Member
I wonder why Nixi don't care about it. Don't they realize how they and INDRP arbitration, not to mention "honorable" INDRP arbitrators, look in views of everyone but them.

If they are unable to find few honest and competent arbitrators in India, they could outsource dispute proceedings to UDRP arbitrators. Being non-profit org, they have enough cash to cover UDRP fees.
 

domainpundit

Active Member
Country flag
I wonder why Nixi don't care about it. Don't they realize how they and INDRP arbitration, not to mention "honorable" INDRP arbitrators, look in views of everyone but them.

If they are unable to find few honest and competent arbitrators in India, they could outsource dispute proceedings to UDRP arbitrators. Being non-profit org, they have enough cash to cover UDRP fees.
I can't understand either.. INDRP is nothing but official route to steal the domain names..hope registry at least come to pragmatic approach.. I lost my respect for Mr Ranjan for sure after reading this thread.
 
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
R indiaoye.com on sale now For Sale 0
Prashant Sharan Mike Mann sells LightRock.com for $94,888 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan GGRG. com's latest Liquid Domains Market Report Resources 0
Prashant Sharan LoanDepot.com files two UDRPs against alleged cybersquatter Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Nishith Appraisal for a .COM Domain Domain Appraisals 2
Prashant Sharan 19th October Market Update: $282k in Sales - SWW.com sold for $34,833 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 18th October Market Update: $270k in Sales - WisconsinGazette.com sold for $35,944 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 17th October Market Update: $283k in Sales - Uncle.com sold for $66,002 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 16th October Market Update: $297k in Sales - Shun.com sold for $57,504 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 13th October Market Update: $401k in Sales - Confirm.com sold for $108,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan DomainSherpa reviews Contactless.com, BlowMyMind.com, SouthCarolinaTitle.com Resources 0
Prashant Sharan Confirm.com sells for $108,000 via Sedo Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan RDNH in CreditHero.com dispute Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 12th October Market Update: $240k in Sales - BusinessCoaching.com sold for $29,082 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 11th October Market Update: $296k in Sales - SquareOne.com sold for $35,333 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 8th October Market Update: $220k in Sales - QRApp.com sold for $10,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Picture. Com gets embroiled in RDNH Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan Amazon acquires Podcast.com Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 7th October Market Update: $273k in Sales - TopDesk.com.au sold for $19,418 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 6th October Market Update: $304k in Sales - CentreBet.com sold for $39,100 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan RDNH alert in the GreenGlobe.com case Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 5th October Market Update: $175k in Sales - MoneyRails.com sold for $7,495 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan KickStart Commerce: TexasTieGuy.com’s Darrell Spence talks to Alvin Brown Resources 0
Prashant Sharan Logan Flatt takes NoMatterWhat(.)com from $360 purchase to a $22,999 sale Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 4th October Market Update: $175k in Sales - MoneyRails.com sold for $7,495 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Rick Swartz adds to the eternal .com Vs New GTLD fight Resources 0
Prashant Sharan Rick Swartz adds to the eternal .com Vs New GTLD fight Resources 0
Prashant Sharan 3rd October Market Update: $318k in Sales - Tapis.com sold for $12,621 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 3rd October Market Update: $318k in Sales - Tapis.com sold for $12,621 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan The YouLoveFruit.com cybersquatting dispute Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan Lawsuit filed over Celluvation.com Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 1st October Market Update: $318k in Sales - Tapis.com sold for $12,621 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan DN Journal Report: NAS.com fetches six figures and other sales Resources 0
Prashant Sharan 30th September Market Update: $253k in Sales - OneFor.com sold for $10,000 Non-Indian Domains 0
DNJournal.com 3-Letter .Com Changes Hands for $720,000 in the Biggest Domain Sale Reported So Far This Year The Lounge 0
Prashant Sharan 28th September Market Update: $233k in Sales - Horsey.com sold for $6,708 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 27th September Market Update: $207k in Sales - BioCore.com sold for $6,100 Non-Indian Domains 0
S traveltrip.uk financesanalyst.com Non-India Related Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Spase.com drama: Spase.io owner gets whacked by Rick Swartz Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 25th September Market Update: $222k in Sales - Chiara.com sold for $13,222 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 24th September Market Update: $187k in Sales - Rascals.com sold for $11,800 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Sherpa Founder's Series: How Chris Snyder made a bank with BANKS. COM Resources 0
Prashant Sharan Post the UDRP loss for Pocketbook.com, Pocketbook e-reader company goes to US Court Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan 23rd September Market Update: $187k in Sales - Rascals.com sold for $11,800 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan 22nd September Market Update: $255k in Sales - Shortbread.com sold for $14,049 Non-Indian Domains 0
Prashant Sharan Mrs. Jello wins Spase.com UDRP filed in bad faith by Spase.io owner Legal Issues and Dispute 0
Prashant Sharan Imperial.com is the new high-end domain brokerage Registrars 0
Prashant Sharan 20th September Market Update: $226k in Sales - ThePirateBay.com sold for $35,150 Non-Indian Domains 0
P Portingo.com- The Digital Asset Marketplace Introduce Yourself 0
Prashant Sharan 19th September Market Update: $272k in Sales - Detour.com sold for $65,006 Non-Indian Domains 0

Similar threads

whois



Forums dedicated to Indian domain names, including buying, selling, appraising, developing, and monetizing.

About Us

Threads
26,883
Messages
73,853
Members
7,639
Latest member
rohanarya2612
Top Bottom