CyberKing
Domain Investor
Now here is a INDRP case whose arbitration decision I have waited for like NONE till date. An interesting case, involving an entity that is 49% owned by the government as the complainant and a mere individual ordinary denizen. That too complainant does NOT yet own GSTN.IN (which represents the company initials - however can also be defended easily by the registrant). Before I lead you to the verdict here are my thoughts:
1. Such blatant RDNH cases should be heavily penalized by NIXI's process - given the court systems do not
2. There should be pre-screening by a 3 Member Qualified Panel of all INDRP filings (enough justification by complainant is never provided meeting the Dispute Policy rules - all cases are allowed in and the respondent has to jump through a lot of hurdles)
3. INDRP arbitration should itself have a 3 member panel (nothing to do with this decision)
4. Such wrongful claims (RDNH) should be contested in the civil high courts for damages
Now to break the suspense you can click on the link below:
http://registry.in/system/files/GSTIN.pdf
PS: Now on to GAADI.IN decision - awaited in a week...
1. Such blatant RDNH cases should be heavily penalized by NIXI's process - given the court systems do not
2. There should be pre-screening by a 3 Member Qualified Panel of all INDRP filings (enough justification by complainant is never provided meeting the Dispute Policy rules - all cases are allowed in and the respondent has to jump through a lot of hurdles)
3. INDRP arbitration should itself have a 3 member panel (nothing to do with this decision)
4. Such wrongful claims (RDNH) should be contested in the civil high courts for damages
Now to break the suspense you can click on the link below:
http://registry.in/system/files/GSTIN.pdf
PS: Now on to GAADI.IN decision - awaited in a week...