Ceres
New Member
The India-based respondent in this National Arbitration Forum case lost the typo domains BllueNile.com, BlueNiile.com and BlueNille.com.
The complainant, Blue Nile Inc., owns a US trademark for BLUE NILE. The mark is used in association with the online sale of diamonds, jewelery and watches.
The respondent did not respond to the complaint. The disputed domains had links to ads related to the sale of online diamonds and jewelry products.
I see this particular respondent owns more typo domains involving well-known trademarks. Well, I expect we'll see this respondent named in a few more arbitration cases in the future...
The complainant, Blue Nile Inc., owns a US trademark for BLUE NILE. The mark is used in association with the online sale of diamonds, jewelery and watches.
The respondent did not respond to the complaint. The disputed domains had links to ads related to the sale of online diamonds and jewelry products.
A predicable outcome!Additionally, the Panel has determined that Respondent has engaged in typosquatting.
I see this particular respondent owns more typo domains involving well-known trademarks. Well, I expect we'll see this respondent named in a few more arbitration cases in the future...