Tool for .in status lists: bulk whois

Discussion in 'General Indian Domain Name Discussion' started by domaining123, Feb 29, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  2. Ace

    Ace United States Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    1,176
    Likes Received:
    762
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does it run on Mac OS X or Linux?
     
  3. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  4. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  5. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  6. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How much faster are the .in scans ? :)
     
  7. Daver

    Daver Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2011
    Messages:
    84
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    A Suggestion.. Maybe user should get a option to select the desired data, I mean not everybody wants to know the Reg Country every time, so Program should let user select the information before starting scan. ?? At minimum maybe somebody just want to do a Available-or-Not scan.. Perhaps it will increase speed also..
     
  8. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Avail / Not Avail DRAMATICALLY INCREASES SCAN SPEED !

    Avail / Not Avail / Pending Delete / Pending Delete Restorable does the same.

    Problem is as you query the whois database more and more times with the SAME IP address the amount of information returned is limited. That is why the ONLY solution we found was socks, with all kinds of other testing to make sure reg date, status by those four groups etc .. are all returned.

    Otherwise our Server Based script would start repeating invalid results - wasn't gathering enough data is why ... I have, at one point of time got a scan in 1 hour sorting by avail / pending / pending delete all LLL.in - not sure what I did with that copy though :(

    All I have is our new copy as we figured people would want to see original reg date as scrolling back to 2005 registrations dropping is a sure fire way to find better domains in large gathered lists. Rather than domains registered last year.
     
  9. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...:)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  10. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  11. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Domaining123 - Told you there would be issues :)

    The absolutely only way ... Is to have user get SOCKS installed on their own server. That is why the price of my software went up even more, because not only getting socks installed by their sys admin but the extra time it takes to get everything tweaked even after SOCKS is installed.

    I am 1000% sure your versions is GREAT - realy I am. But I don't need to scan .com or .net. I can get free daily drop list and even have free sorting tools available online :)

    My problem rests in the fact that I have 100's of thousands of .in names to scan ... And I need the most efficient way to do that - the script I have is for VERY serious domainers. The script you have is for the casual user who doesn't need top end speed ot continously tweaking things to get the fastest scans for .in

    Hell, at the moment, I am not even offering scans for any other extension than .in - JUST .in :) of course and .in variants
     
  12. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  13. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would offer to test but my SOCKS PROXIES are going to be accessible from the server ONLY. My software is now going to a monthly fee except for users who have bought it. You have a huge advantage in pricing, mine is a huge advantage in speed :)

    P.S. I tried 3 private proxy sites and spent over $150 - and even private proxies time out after an hour or so ... Just a heads up, test thoroughly if you do find a solution !
     
  14. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  15. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Indeed - it is not for a casual domainer.

    And my service best operate flawlessly or I will have some pissed off customers :)

    Best be on the ball, huh ?
     
  16. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  17. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Scanning speed is critical to those of us with lists of 1,000,000 domain names :eek:)

    And drop catch speed IS critical - Watch it soar in the next couple weeks through Catch Names !

    I have a total of nearly 1.3 million names now with my lists combined, about 250K are probably duplicates.

    P.S. TRUST ME - I am NOT the only one :)
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  18. domaining123

    domaining123 France Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2011
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    115
    Trophy Points:
    43
    ...
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 26, 2012
  19. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Did you read MY Sales thread. This has been taken into consideration already.
     
  20. ryanmlanane

    ryanmlanane New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    754
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also, my main CONCERN is not abusing .in registry. My scanners will be doing less repeated scans of in registry than your scanners will :) Unless you relay through your own server and use SQUID :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.