You are taking this thread to another discussion ? 1.If web.in whois record is not proper then you should contact Directi not Mitsu ? You didn't get my point. Web.in indrp is fishy decision. Businessx.in was showing compliance issues before current whois update. A compliance issue related to domain name can't be confidential.Read the whole thread."web" trademark owner was in garment business as per INURD now starting registry service with a address of India and phone number of USA.whole thing is fishy. 2. If you donot search properly then what will you get see this link : ICANN | WIPO Report on New Generic Top-Level Domains: Intellectual Property Considerations and then go to point No. 59 ? please donot tell now that ICANN link is also forged ? http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisionsx/2001/dinfo00000-00199.html and see case no.DINFO2001-00011-0001. Thanks for doing the search for me. 3. For your last statement filing case is choice of TM holder that if their IP rights are violated or not ? I am not only who raised this point. Read this Business.Info Accredited Registrar for .in ? PLEASE STOP THIS NOW AS YOU ARE GETTING PERSONAL ? PLEASE DONOT GO OUT OF DISCUSSION. I am not getting personal.Only pointing out fishy practices prevalent in .in and .in registry level.No wonder in is not getting attention of big portion of market.