RetiredMember
Guest
We do provide support to customers who wants to secure their own domain name back......You may contact Mitsu...
Last edited by a moderator:
dalhousie.co.in - We are giving as gift (no drop charges) to first Mitsu customer who PM us on this forum (Cost INR 79 payable)
I have a question to Mitsu.
You got the hexonet .in drop catch service shut down, by manipulating the registry.
Isn't it unethical now for you to launch a drop catch service of your own?
Can hexonet restart their drop catch service now?
Thanks for your extensive reply.
We are not directly affiliated with hexonet, but know from trusted sources that you were the one who brought the issue of hexonet backorder service before the registry. While we do appreciate the fact that you are doing some good work in promoting the .in space, we are also concerned that some of your partners were involved in hijacking ultrapremium domains like jobs.in
We have been monitoring the performance of your drop catching services, and your success rate seems poor compared to hexonet's when they were running theirs. As such, we are not surprised that you want to "discuss business" with them.
I am all for entrepreneurship and proactive behavior. Thanks Mitsu for providing valuable services.
I have a hunch that somehow domain drop catching false under GREY AREA and am worried about possible consequences for acquiring a domain name through drop catching service. On the INREGISTRY website there is a dispute resolution policy here. Point number 6 in there states as below.
My problem is with "purpose of selling, renting" because if you look at the world especially America and Europe buying and selling is a legitimate business. Why not in India? we Indians are learning and adopting ourselves to western business models and personal comfort products, why not make INREGISTRY change this policy.
Why not LEGITIMIZE this business with some governing policies like any other and allow FREE TRADE. Create equal opportunity build confidence in investors etc why not....
You are a Registrar who actively engages with customers at this inforum.in, many of whom engage in buying/selling .in domains on a daily basis which is NOT ALLOWED by INREGISTRY. As a registrar are you not having conflict of interest? I hope and believe that You and other .in accredited registrars have for sure thought about this and are working on it.
1 person/1-2 person companies cannot risk to invest because of the above clause. This clause is what that is actually preventing me to use your services or any others. A small company cannot develop 1000's of domains or put place holders just to prove my intent to be protected from the LAW, It is TOO MUCH. Instead manage a small portfolio even with ability to invest in more .in domains, just not able to invest and pursue aggressively due to the above.
Thank you for your time you have a great night.
Thought it is apt to put out this question to you as you are an accredited .in registrar you can shed light on this matter more than anyone. If any of you think this is off topic please go ahead and move it or delete as you deem appropriate.
I tried Hexonet's .in dropcatching and their success rate was high, my only two complaints with the service were:
- relatively high backordering price (about $70)
- domains with 2+ backorders were auctioned off (so the best domains were always awarded to the richest people)
Mitsu has a more affordable pricing and doesn't put domains on auction, which is great thing. But my complaint with Mitsu's service is that, in order to give everyone the opportunity to catch quality names, backorders should be received on a First-Come-First-Served basis (like Name.com does), otherwise only the richer domainers (those that own a large portofolio at Mitsu) will have access to the higher quality names (with 2+ backorders). @ Mitsu: I hope you consider my feedback.