Gerald Levine on exploring the meanings of “right” and “legitimate interest” (UDRP Proceedings)

Digital Pandit

Well-Known Member
Country flag
For complainant, the second leg in determining cybersquatting under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) is evidence respondent lacks both rights and legitimate interests in the challenged domain name (Paragraph 4(a)(ii)). I underscore “both” because proving one but not the other is not good enough. This seems obvious, so why suggest there is something to explore about “rights” and “legitimate interests” if their meanings hardly need explication?

Full article link
 

whois



Forums dedicated to Indian domain names, including buying, selling, appraising, developing, and monetizing.

About Us

Threads
27,275
Messages
74,299
Members
7,656
Latest member
endrydaa
Top Bottom