Marketing with a budget

[Dusart]

A lot of times we talk about marketing tactics that are free, but when you have the budget for marketing your website, what would be the best way to get an audience in the least amount of time?

 

[Jason76]

Myself, I am incredibly cynical about cheaper paid traffic - seeing much of it as annoying visitors or possibly even being fake. In that case, I'd have to go with bought signature ads and paid guest posting. I feel like I could get a good bang for my buck with those methods and I can see the source and know it doesn't annoy people.

 

[tulip]

I agree with you Jason. At times, looking to get an audience very quickly can backfire. You don't want traffic in your website that has no quality or is annoying. Most times though, quality comes at a cost.

 

[overcast]

When you are on low budget. You have to find out what works with that budget. Instead of going for the traffic source that is random. You have to find one that works. Take FBAds for example, on low budget it can give you specific result. But as far as display ads are concerned they may not be good during the initial period. So it's trial and error phase.

 

[marsh]

When you are on low budget. You have to find out what works with that budget. Instead of going for the traffic source that is random. You have to find one that works. Take FBAds for example, on low budget it can give you specific result. But as far as display ads are concerned they may not be good during the initial period. So it's trial and error phase.

This is absolutely true; rather than just run at random, it will be important to work with the budget at hand. Advertizing on Facebook has worked for a lot of people. I have also heard that they also have paid-up ads?