@chandan, yes the domains turned out to be stolen and later sold to the respondent.
As you can see from the
decision, the complainant failed to win back the domains via the National Arbitration Forum as that's not really the right channel for him to use to get back his stolen domains.
Quote:
|
Given the generic nature of the second level domains, “recent,” “they” and “that,” the mere acquisition by Complainant of the disputed domain names cannot possibly give rise to trademark rights in RECENT.NET, THEY.NET or THAT.NET. Nor can intent to use give rise to trademark rights.
|
I assume the complainant needs to seek remedy via a court of law.