INForum.in - Home of the Indian Domain Industry
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Ceres's Avatar
    Ceres is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,206
    Thanks
    544
    Thanked 576 Times in 347 Posts

    Default Starbucks Wins INDRP Case

    Starbucks has won the domain Starbucks.co.in in a recent INDRP decision. IMHO, it was a predictable decision.

    Although the respondent filed a response to the complaint, he failed to show that he had a legitimate interest in using the name Starbucks. I view Starbucks as a well-known mark - what about you?

    The respondent has submitted that at the time of booking /registering the domain name www. starbucks.co.in the .in registry or his registrar did not ask him to submit any supportive documents / evidence to register the Domain name. The respondent has further submitted that the complainant has neglected the Domain name www. starbucks.co.in for past 04 years at the time of registering www. starbucks.in even though the .co. in extension was available(fron year 2002) before .in extension released. He has prayed for cancellation of complaint and allow him to use the domain name for his own purpose of another business which will not be in complainant's industry.
    Realistically, I think most registrars neither monitor nor care if someone registers a trademarked domain. Also, if a trademark owner doesn't register the domain, it doesn't mean the registrant acquires the right to use the trademarked domain.
    Last edited by Ceres; 02-11-2010 at 12:48 AM. Reason: Fixed broken link.

  2. #2
    OzDomainer is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Perth, Australia
    Posts
    91
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 28 Times in 13 Posts

    Default Re: Starbucks Wins INDRP Case

    When will these people learn??!!

    DON'T REGISTER TRADEMARKS OR BRANDS!!

    THEY WILL GET YOU IN THE END!!

    Stick to generic commercial or product names. its not hard!

    Regards

    Ed
    OzDomainer.com

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to OzDomainer For This Useful Post:

    Ceres (12-01-2009)

  4. #3
    Ceres's Avatar
    Ceres is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    2,206
    Thanks
    544
    Thanked 576 Times in 347 Posts

    Default Re: Starbucks Wins INDRP Case

    Quote Originally Posted by OzDomainer View Post
    When will these people learn??!!
    I think there are two main reasons why these people are registering such trademarked domains:

    Reason 1: They simply don't care that they're infringing on a third party TM. They're out to make a profit.

    Reason 2: They didn't do their homework and learn about TMs and TM infringement.

    Both end up hurting the domain industry...

  5. #4
    HappyHour's Avatar
    HappyHour is offline Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    dndb.in
    Posts
    52
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Default Re: Starbucks Wins INDRP Case

    Quote Originally Posted by Ceres View Post
    I view Starbucks as a well-known mark - what about you?



    Realistically, I think most registrars neither monitor nor care if someone registers a trademarked domain. Also, if a trademark owner doesn't register the domain, it doesn't mean the registrant acquires the right to use the trademarked domain.
    I agree full and don´t think the registrars care who registers what and this is very similar to the most auction sites. They don´t care if the name is trademarked.
    Also Starbucks is worldwide known how can someone register this name ?
    Maybe of two reasons.
    He/She is an idot or quite unscrupulous.

    Last edited by HappyHour; 12-01-2009 at 09:33 PM. Reason: typo
    For sale !DonDomain.com
    Do follow articles: DNDB.in

  6. #5
    mwzd's Avatar
    mwzd is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Mumbai, India
    Posts
    128
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 63 Times in 30 Posts

    Default Re: Starbucks Wins INDRP Case

    Actually Ceres, the real reason is:

    3: They hope the tm holder will pay them 10x - 20x of reg fee for their efforts. Unlikely to happen now that INDRP only costs $250 to file.

    Generics can also be tms, its all in the usage, but yeah, registering tms is quite stupid, specially with so many good domains still available.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Respondent Wins INDRP Case: Chiesi.in
    By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and Dispute
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2009, 01:41 PM
  2. Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute
    By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and Dispute
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-03-2009, 11:35 AM
  3. Cybersquatting...INDRP case
    By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and Dispute
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-08-2009, 09:35 PM
  4. Convergys wins Convergys.in in INDRP case
    By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and Dispute
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-01-2009, 06:31 AM
  5. Wills.in - INDRP case
    By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and Dispute
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-16-2009, 11:14 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •