Results 1 to 2 of 2
-
08-04-2009, 01:42 AM #1
Repeat Cybersquatter Loses Another UDRP Case
I came across a UDRP case in which the complainant, Balenciaga S.A., won the disputed domain BalenciagaHandbags.com from the respondent who is based in India. Balenciaga has trademarks worldwide for BALENCIAGA (the mark covers products such as handbags).
The respondent is no stranger to UDRP cases. To date, none of his cases have been defended…well with domains like celebrex.org, pfizer.org, valiumeffort.com and xenial.org, it comes as no surprise…
This pattern of registering domain names in bad faith will make it that much harder for the respondent to win UDRP cases in the future. Although lately I've been wondering whether or not such respondents really care about this point.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Ceres For This Useful Post:
Jeff (08-05-2009)
-
08-05-2009, 01:52 AM #2
Re: Repeat Cybersquatter Loses Another UDRP Case
It's not worth defending cases like those... the guy should just turn those domains over to the plaintiff voluntarily instead of letting them go undefended.
Similar Threads
-
Google wins domains in UDRP case
By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and DisputeReplies: 2Last Post: 04-07-2009, 10:53 AM -
UDRP to go Paperless?
By Ceres in forum Legal Issues and DisputeReplies: 3Last Post: 01-15-2009, 02:26 PM


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

