Quick Search

Threads: 9,438
Posts: 33,518
Members: 3,615
Welcome to our newest member, m6ll7yk2y
Indian Domain Name Blog

TBR Domains

DomainBits Blog

AmazingDomains.co.uk

Domain Name Forum

Buy a Domains Name

Sell Domain Names

Arbel Arif

Domainer from India

Hyderabad

DN Attorney

Australian Domains

Hindi Domain Names

Napier Domains

UK Domain Forum





 
INForum.in - Home of the Indian Domain Name Industry
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2009, 12:19 PM
Ceres's Avatar
Ceres Ceres is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,206
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 544
Thanked 572 Times in 345 Posts
Ceres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to behold
Default Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute

No surprise that Nestle, the well-known makers of Nescafe coffee, won Nescafe.co.in in the latest INDRP case.

On two occasions, Nestle hired a third party to seek out the intentions of the respondent, wherein the respondent agreed to sell the domain. However, in its complaint Nestle stated the sale price exceeded its out-of-pocket costs and no transaction proceeded.

The respondent changed the whois owner quite a few times, although the address always remained the same. This includes changing the owner to "Nescafe Limited" on a few occasions - that's the reason why the respondent in this case is "Nescafe Limited."

In its complaint, Nestle points out that the respondent's address is the same as the respondent's address in the INDRP cases of KFC.co.in and TacoBell.co.in (owner name is different). The Arbitrator stated that this inferred a pattern of similar conduct by the respondent. The Arbitrator also viewed the respondent's various aliases as a form of cyber flight.

The respondent filed no response in this case.

Last edited by Ceres; 06-02-2009 at 12:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ceres For This Useful Post:
Tipsfromthetop (06-02-2009)
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2009, 08:13 PM
Tipsfromthetop Tipsfromthetop is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 39
iTrader: (2)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Tipsfromthetop
Default Re: Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute

Got to laugh when you read these things, what did the domainer owner expect?? publicity hungry person i guess but on the otherside of the coin its also very clever most companies are willing to purchase a name to save court costs, solicitor fees but then thats when the fine line comes in to play..

If your greedy.. expect to lose... If you cover Reg fees and some profit pocket money then expect to win.

the last point is a win/win they get domain your earn a couple of quid but theres alot of greed in this business and its normally the abitrator that wins and the domainer looses out or worse case gets a slap.

Good Post
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-02-2009, 11:48 PM
wot's Avatar
wot wot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,054
iTrader: (6)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 336 Times in 193 Posts
wot is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tipsfromthetop View Post
Got to laugh when you read these things, what did the domainer owner expect?? publicity hungry person i guess but on the otherside of the coin its also very clever most companies are willing to purchase a name to save court costs, solicitor fees but then thats when the fine line comes in to play..

If your greedy.. expect to lose... If you cover Reg fees and some profit pocket money then expect to win.

the last point is a win/win they get domain your earn a couple of quid but theres alot of greed in this business and its normally the abitrator that wins and the domainer looses out or worse case gets a slap.

Good Post
On the nail, these are blatant tm's and the registrant deserves to get slapped and his actions are laughable.

I have personally had experience of companies that are prepared to pay to settle but generally out of pocket + expenses (less than taking it arbitration). BTW - it was only a one off .com that was not a Nescafe/Taco Bell type of name.
__________________
Namasté.comMonikerBlog.com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-03-2009, 11:35 AM
pubdomains.in pubdomains.in is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bits & Byte
Posts: 183
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 44
Thanked 81 Times in 51 Posts
pubdomains.in is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Nestle Wins Nescafe.co.in in INDRP dispute

No surprises in this case, Nescafe == Nestle and anyone registering a TM is bound to lose.

Cheers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RIM Wins UDRP Dispute against Indian Firm Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 05-14-2009 02:57 PM
Convergys wins Convergys.in in INDRP case Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 3 05-01-2009 06:31 AM
INDRP Dispute Decision: Alibaba.co.in Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 10-28-2008 01:22 AM
INDRP Dispute Decision: TamilMatrimony.co.in Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 10-24-2008 04:14 PM
Recent INDRP dispute decisions Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 4 10-02-2008 11:29 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:09 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

A vBSkinworks Design

Please Note: INForum reserves the right to remove domains that are listed here that we consider, in our sole discretion, to have no legitimate reason for their registration other than to trade off the goodwill of a third party.