Quick Search

Threads: 9,439
Posts: 33,519
Members: 3,615
Welcome to our newest member, m6ll7yk2y
Indian Domain Name Blog

TBR Domains

DomainBits Blog

AmazingDomains.co.uk

Domain Name Forum

Buy a Domains Name

Sell Domain Names

Arbel Arif

Domainer from India

Hyderabad

DN Attorney

Australian Domains

Hindi Domain Names

Napier Domains

UK Domain Forum





 
INForum.in - Home of the Indian Domain Name Industry
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009, 04:09 PM
Ceres's Avatar
Ceres Ceres is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,206
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 544
Thanked 572 Times in 345 Posts
Ceres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to beholdCeres is a splendid one to behold
Default Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

The Pantaloons.in INDRP decision has just been released:

(1) The complainant Pantaloons Retail (India) Ltd won the domain Pantaloons.in. It owns the trademark/brand for 'Pantaloon' in India.

(2) The respondent argued that 'pantaloon' is a common word in the English language and that Pantaloon's trademark(s) do not give it 100% full and unrestricted ownership and control of the word 'pantaloons.'

(3) Pantaloon argued that by virtue of its extensive use and marketing, 'Pantaloon' has become distinctive to its business.

(4) Before filing its INDRP complaint, Pantaloon approached the respondent to try and buy the domain from him. In response to this move by Pantaloon, the Arbitrator ordered Pantaloon to pay a sum of Rs.25,000 to NIXI as penalty:

Quote:
for being an accomplice in an act of illegality
Basically the Arbitrator is saying that Pantaloon shouldn't have negotiated with the respondent but should have gone through 'legal channels.'

(5) The Arbitrator ordered the respondent to pay 1000 US Dollars to NIXI:

Quote:
as punishment and penalty for resorting to illegal means/ cyber squatting.
(6) The Arbitrator directed the registry of NIXI to:

Quote:
send a copy of this decision to the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi at New Delhi to take further actions against the miscreants as this tribunal cannot go beyond its jurisdiction.
This is now the 7th INDRP case Pantaloon has won.

Last edited by Ceres; 06-27-2010 at 01:42 AM. Reason: Fixed broken link.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2009, 04:15 PM
Ace Ace is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 527
iTrader: (4)
Thanks: 330
Thanked 508 Times in 200 Posts
Ace will become famous soon enoughAce will become famous soon enough
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

Funny, that Pantaloons had to pay in Rs. and Respondent in dollars.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-27-2009, 06:05 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,899
iTrader: (12)
Thanks: 1,631
Thanked 392 Times in 240 Posts
Jeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud of
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

I think that Pantaloons deserved to win this case. But the last page or two of the decision is truly bizarre.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2011, 04:26 PM
meditang meditang is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 242
iTrader: (8)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 90 Times in 37 Posts
meditang is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

So much for the domain won at indrp
This is the current status of the domain pantaloons.in:

Status:PENDING DELETE SCHEDULED FOR RELEASE
Status:HOLD

Anyone wants to catch it?
It drops in 5 days time
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to meditang For This Useful Post:
catchnames (01-08-2011)
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2011, 07:11 PM
warbux warbux is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 603
iTrader: (5)
Thanks: 478
Thanked 300 Times in 181 Posts
warbux is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

NIXI actions are soooooooooo third world...
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2011, 07:25 PM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,899
iTrader: (12)
Thanks: 1,631
Thanked 392 Times in 240 Posts
Jeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud of
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

Too funny!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2011, 01:03 AM
catchnames catchnames is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 188
iTrader: (0)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 26 Times in 18 Posts
catchnames is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pantaloons.in - INDRP Decision

Someone familiar did grab it. :-) Hope
http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/text/2010/d2010-0587.html
will be helpful in future.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Umm.in - INDRP decision Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 04-23-2009 07:04 PM
all.in - INDRP decision Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 9 04-20-2009 07:38 PM
BrandFactory.in - INDRP decision Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 03-13-2009 09:18 PM
INDRP Dispute Decision: Alibaba.co.in Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 0 10-28-2008 01:22 AM
INDRP Decision: Mentis.in Ceres Legal Issues and Dispute 3 10-22-2008 02:50 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 AM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

A vBSkinworks Design

Please Note: INForum reserves the right to remove domains that are listed here that we consider, in our sole discretion, to have no legitimate reason for their registration other than to trade off the goodwill of a third party.