Quick Search

Threads: 1,160
Posts: 4,587
Members: 1,438
Welcome to our newest member, QefLyhat


 
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2007, 06:04 PM
ekaln ekaln is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 230
ekaln is an unknown quantity at this point
Default More recent dispute resolutions

More recent dispute resolutions: http://www.inregistry.in/policies/di...ute_decisions/

autocad.in
sonyericsson.in
mcafee.co.in
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2007, 09:00 PM
DomainLobe DomainLobe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 116
DomainLobe
Default Re: More recent dispute resolutions

Thanks again Steve for the valuable info.
Interesting it is! that a couple LLL.in are on the chart?
No NNN.IN thankfully
__________________
.IN is where its at!!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-12-2007, 09:50 PM
ekaln ekaln is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 230
ekaln is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: More recent dispute resolutions

Yes - a little disturbing that LLL.in are on that chart:

web.in
isp.in
kbb.in
oki.in

I'd have to say that I can't imagine any of those being considered squatting in .com
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2007, 01:40 AM
Abstracts.tv Abstracts.tv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 227
Abstracts.tv
Default Re: More recent dispute resolutions

Some good information indeed. Thanks for this info, Steve.

Frank
__________________
Formerly known as Knarfmusik.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2007, 04:59 AM
FishSEO FishSEO is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 198
FishSEO is on a distinguished road
Default Re: More recent dispute resolutions

Even more interesting is the fact that ISP.in was ruled to be registered in bad faith, so you would think the complainant would get the name. Wrong! The complainant was ruled to not have provided enough evidence that they should own the name. Now the name is being held by the registry, which some believe is not acting int the best interest if registrants.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-13-2007, 01:09 PM
ekaln ekaln is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 230
ekaln is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Re: More recent dispute resolutions

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishSEO
Even more interesting is the fact that ISP.in was ruled to be registered in bad faith, so you would think the complainant would get the name. Wrong! The complainant was ruled to not have provided enough evidence that they should own the name. Now the name is being held by the registry, which some believe is not acting int the best interest if registrants.
The same thing happened with business.in if I remember right.

Basically the decision was that both parties were wrong so the registry will get to keep it. It will be very interesting to see what happens to those domains in the long run.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0

A vBSkinworks Design