Thread: Indian complainant is awarded .com from WIPO, but owns neither the TM nor .in/.co.in

Originally Posted by Ace

Assume both parties had TM for Microsoft, one deals in software and the other in Milk. But the owner of Microsoft.com who deals in Milk, occasionally redirects to Apple.com, but on other time has an under construction page. What do you think now.

Like I said before, the redirection of the domain to another political party was the only thing that gives legitimacy to this reassignation because it was considered (rightly) as bad faith, but if he had used the domain correctly, it would have been a totally unfair decision.

Originally Posted by the_poet

Like I said before, the redirection of the domain to another political party was the only thing that gives legitimacy to this reassignation because it was considered (rightly) as bad faith, but if he had used the domain correctly, it would have been a totally unfair decision.

only if ....

Interesting decision of bad faith as criteria.