Thread: Domain Privacy - a must!

One can choose to either stick to the norms laid down by the registry or go their own way with potential risks involved in it.

I suppose no one is going to walk up to someone to check if they've stuck to the norms laid down.

If someone is not abiding by the norms, in all probability they know it even before someone lets them know.

The point of the thread was not how you can circumvent the .in registrar. The point was to suggest that we band together, start a petition, make our voice heard about this issue.

Registrar.in would still have peoples genuine identities, names addresses etc. stored safe and sound in their files but only accessible by the Registrar staff or by court order.

Registrar.in would provide privacy automatically as part of the registration service. This is what i'm saying: only a small change needs to occur not even the agreement but the way the .in registar is doing things.
I believe the agreement doesn't say that .in ownership must be made public, but simple says that the ownership must have correct information?
If you deal with any business you don't expect them broadcast your name, address and email to the world do you?