View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2009, 01:08 AM
Jeff's Avatar
Jeff Jeff is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,899
iTrader: (12)
Thanks: 1,631
Thanked 392 Times in 240 Posts
Jeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud ofJeff has much to be proud of
Default Re: Did you post comment about ICANN's URS?

Thanks pubdomains.in - a very helpful post!

I agree that a site shutdown is really bad. My understanding is that the moment you appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction, this is stayed and your website goes back up.

However, I agree with you that the URS is much worse than the UDRP (which is already pretty bad).

The problem is that all of these procedures were simply meant to deal with the most obvious cases of cybersquatting. However, the panelists have extended their powers far beyond that.
Reply With Quote